Saturday, December 5, 2020

#577 can anyone plz explain Kant's formulation of the

Can anyone plz explain Kant's formulation of the - Psychology

ChemistryExplain daily providing Q&A content “#577 can anyone plz explain Kant's formulation of the" in Anatomy and physiology, Anatomy and physiology flash cards, Anatomy and physiology revealed, Heart anatomy and physiology, Human anatomy and physiology textbook

ChemistryExplain “#577 can anyone plz explain Kant's formulation of the in Anatomy and physiology, Anatomy and physiology flash cards, Anatomy and ph
Get the Free Online Chemistry Q&A Questions And Answers with explain. To crack any examinations and Interview tests these Chemistry Questions And Answers are very useful. Here we have uploaded the Free Online Chemistry Questions. Here we are also given the all chemistry topic.

 ChemistryExplain team has covered all Topics related to inorganic, organic, physical chemistry, and others So, Prepare these Chemistry Questions and Answers with Explanation Pdf.

For More Chegg Questions

Join Our Telegram Channel for Covers All Update by ChemistryExplain:- Click Now

Free Chegg Question

Can anyone plz explain Kant's formulation of the " categorical imperative"?

Free Chegg AnswerFor More Chemistry Notes and Helpful Content Subscribe Our YouTube Chanel - Chemistry Explain  

Free Chegg Answer

Kant gives three formulations of the categorical imperative.
1: Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.
This means that you should only do something if it would be okay if everybody else did it. For example, if you are questioning the morality of lying, you would formulate a maxim or principle, that states "It is okay to lie". This is clearly not a principle one would wish to write into law since nobody likes to be lied to. Therefore, it is immoral to lie.
2: Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end and never merely as a means to an end.
First, a couple of definitions. Means: the way a person gets somewhere; method(i.e.: a means of transportation). End: the ultimate goal.
This is the same as saying that a person needs to be able to be in control of themself and not simply manipulated. At the same time, it is okay to manipulate somebody as long as they are still in control of their own person. In the same case of lying, asking a person for some money and telling them that you will repay them is removing their ability to be an end in themself and you are merely using that person as a means to your end. Therefore, lying is immoral. But something like asking somebody for the time, while itis considered using somebody as a means to your end, does not remove their ability to be their own end. Therefore, it is a perfectly moral action to ask somebody what the time is.
3: Therefore, every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxim always a legislating member in the universal kingdom of ends.
This mainly follows from the first formulation. It is probably the most self-explanatory and logical. Basically, every person should act as though his actions were to be made into a universal law.

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home