#218 World Military Expenditure The following chart shows total

World Military Expenditure The following chart shows total - Math

ChemistryExplain daily providing Q&A content “#218 World Military Expenditure   The following chart shows total" in Bridges math curriculum, Dr mather, Carnegie math, 10th maths, 10th grade math problems, Math

Get the Free Online Chemistry Q&A Questions And Answers with explain. To crack any examinations and Interview tests these Chemistry Questions And Answers are very useful. Here we have uploaded the Free Online Chemistry Questions. Here we are also given the all chemistry topic.

 ChemistryExplain team has covered all Topics related to inorganic, organic, physical chemistry, and others So, Prepare these Chemistry Questions and Answers with Explanation Pdf.

For More Chegg Questions

• Inorganic Chemistry
• Organic Chemistry
• Physical Chemistry

Free Chegg Question

World Military Expenditure   The following chart shows total military and arms trade expenditure from 1992–2010 (t = 0 represents 1990).

†A bar graph titled "World military expenditure" has a horizontal t-axis labeled "Year since 1990" and a vertical axis labeled "$ (billion)". The bar graph has 10 bars. Each bar is associated with a label and an approximate value as listed below.

• 2: 1,200 billion dollars
• 4: 1,150 billion dollars
• 6: 1,050 billion dollars
• 8: 1,050 billion dollars
• 10: 1,100 billion dollars
• 12: 1,200 billion dollars
• 14: 1,350 billion dollars
• 16: 1,450 billion dollars
• 18: 1,600 billion dollars
• 20: 1,750 billion dollars

(a)

If you want to model the expenditure figures with a function of the form

f(t) = at² + bt + c,

would you expect the coefficient a to be positive or negative? Why? HINT [See "Features of a Parabola" in this section.]

We would expect the coefficient to be positive because the curve is concave up.We would expect the coefficient to be negative because the curve is concave up.    We would expect the coefficient to be negative because the curve is concave down.We would expect the coefficient to be positive because the curve is concave down.

(b)

Which of the following models best approximates the data given? (Try to answer this without actually computing values.)

f(t) = −4t² − 56t + 1,300f(t) = −4t² − 56t − 1,300    f(t) = 4t² − 56t − 1,300f(t) = 4t² − 56t + 1,300

(c)

What is the nearest year that would correspond to the vertex of the graph of the correct model from part (b)?

What is the danger of extrapolating the data in either direction?

Extrapolating in the positive direction leads one to predict more and more steeply rising military expenditure, which may or may not occur. Extrapolating in the negative direction predicts less and less steeply increasing military expenditure as we go back in time, contradicting history.Extrapolating in the positive direction leads one to predict less and less steeply rising military expenditure, which may or may not occur. Extrapolating in the negative direction predicts less and less steeply increasing military expenditure as we go back in time, contradicting history.    Extrapolating in the positive direction leads one to predict less and less steeply rising military expenditure, which may or may not occur. Extrapolating in the negative direction predicts more and more steeply increasing military expenditure as we go back in time, contradicting history.Extrapolating in the positive direction leads one to predict more and more steeply rising military expenditure, which may or may not occur. Extrapolating in the negative direction predicts more and more steeply increasing military expenditure as we go back in time, contradicting history.

 For More Chemistry Notes and Helpful Content Subscribe Our YouTube Chanel - Chemistry Explain  

Free Chegg Answer

(a)

 Answer: We would expect the coefficient to be positive because the curve is concave up.

 (b)

 Answer: f(t) = 4t2 − 56t + 1,300

 (c)

 Answer: The nearest year that would correspond to the vertex of the graph of the correct model would be 2004.

 Extrapolating in the positive direction leads one to predict more and more steeply rising military expenditure, which may or may not occur. Extrapolating in the negative direction predicts more and more steeply increasing military expenditure as we go back in time, contradicting history.